EDUCATIONAL LEARNING WITHIN THE MUADALAH UNIT CURRICULUM AND ITS IMPACT ON STUDENT QUALITY AT AL-MUJTAMA’ AL-ISLAMI ISLAMIC BOARDING SCHOOL, JATI AGUNG, SOUTH LAMPUNG
Keywords:
Muadalah curriculum, student quality, educational learningsAbstract
The primary goals of this research are twofold. Initially, it aims to shed light on and scrutinize curriculum learning with reference to its planning, implementation, and evaluation at Al-Mujtama’ Al-Islami Islamic Boarding School. Subsequently, it seeks to gauge the significance and utility of curriculum learning in enhancing student quality at this same institution. A qualitative methodology is adopted in this study, with data amassed through techniques such as interviews, observations, and documentary analysis. The researcher is instrumental in this process, collecting data that comprises field notes, interview responses, participant actions, documentation, and other relevant sources. These inputs continually evolve as the research unfolds. The findings of this study suggest that the curriculum at Al-Mujtama’ Al-Islami Islamic Boarding School incorporates an auxiliary study program directed towards realizing elusive goals, along with notable modifications in the curriculum, specifically within the regions of curriculum planning, execution, and evaluation.
References
Victoria State Government. (2017). Curriculum planning and assessment implementation guide. Department of Education and Training. 2
Trianto. (2010). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif-progresif: Konsep, landasan, dan implementasinya pada kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Kencana.
Samani, M. (2020). Faktor kunci peningkatan mutu pendidikan. Dalam LAM Kependidikan (Ed.), Opini (hlm. 1-4). Jakarta: LAM Kependidikan.
Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free: The art of making quality certain. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
Juran, J. M. (1992). Juran on quality by design: The new steps for planning quality into goods and services. New York: Free Press.
Hamalik, O. (2010). Manajemen pengembangan kurikulum. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Syafaruddin, & Amiruddin. (2017). Manajemen kurikulum. Medan: Perdana Publishing.
Fitri, A. Z. (2013). Manajemen kurikulum pendidikan Islam: Teori dan praktik. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Airasian, P. W., & Russell, M. K. (2012). Classroom assessment: Concepts and applications (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Arifin, Zainal. 2016. Konsep dan Model Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: Remajarosdakarya.
Daft, Richard L.2010. Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
Fadhli Muhammad. 2017. Manajemen Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan. TADBIR : Jurnal Studi Manajemen Pendidikan.
Hasibuan Malayu. 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara. J.Moleong Lexy. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Kunandar. 2011.Guru Profesional: Implementasi kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikandan Sukses dalam Sertifikasi Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Ornstein, Allan C dan Francis P. Hunkins.1978. Curriculum Foundations, Principles, and Issues. New Jersey, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Sukmadinata dkk, Nana Syaodih. Pengendalian Mutu Pendidikan Sekolah Menengah: Konsep, Prinsip, dan Instrumen. Bandung : Refika Adimata.Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung.
Syafarudin dan Aminudin. 2017. Manajemen Kurikulum. Medan : Perdana Publishing.
Wahyudin, Dinn. Manajemen Kurikulum. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Zaenul Fitri, Agus. 2013. Manajemen Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam. Bandung: Alfabeta
