Development of Fraction Teaching Aids to Improve Conceptual Understanding of Grade IV Elementary School Students (SD/MI)
Keywords:
Teaching aids, Fraction Material, Understanding ConceptsAbstract
Mathematics is one of the subjects that students need help understanding. This can be seen from the many students who have difficulty understanding various mathematical material concepts. The ability to understand concepts is the ability of students to understand and correctly understand the material being studied. Students will find it easier to master the material if the learning process carried out is in accordance with the characteristics and needs of the students. This is in line with the need to help students understand various concepts of equivalent fractions at SDN Balearjosari 1 Malang. This occurs because of the lack of mathematics learning aids, so students cannot understand the idea of the material being studied concretely. Based on these problems, researchers developed a teaching aid to make it easier for students to understand the concept of equivalent fractions at the elementary school level. This study uses the Research and Development research method with the Borg and Gall development model, adapting 6 stages: 1. Research and data collection, 2. Planning, 3. Initial product development, 4. Initial field testing, 5. Initial product revision, 6. Main field testing. The level of alat peraga validity obtained from several experts is 94 from material experts, 92 from alat peraga experts, and 96 from learning experts, with the three validation results showing alat peraga validation with very valid criteria. The effectiveness of fractional teaching aids in improving students' concept understanding abilities was obtained with a score of 0.72 or 72.18%, a high category using the N-gain test. By using fractional teaching aids, students' conceptual understanding at SDN Balearjosari 1 Malang increased in the high category.References
Amir, Mohammad Faizal. Buku Ajar Matematika Dasar, 2016.
Assyauqi, Moh. Iqbal. “Model Pengembangan Borg and Gall.” Institut Agama Islam Negeriegeri, no. December (2020): 2–8. https://www.taufiq.net/2019/09/model-penelitian-pengembangan-borg-and.html.
Ayudia, Inge, Wilibaldus Bhoke, Rici Oktari, Maria Carmelita, Veronike Salem, Majidah Khairani, Fitri Mamontho, and Merika Setiawati. Pengembangan Kurikulum PT. MIFANDI MANDIRI DIGITAL, 2023.
Azizah, Siti Rofiatul, Vera Dewi Susanti, and Didin Heri Irawan. “Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Pecahan Melalui Penggunaan Alat Peraga Puzzle Pecahan Siswa Kelas 3.” FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika 9, no. 2 (2023): 157. https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.9.2.157-166.
Baharuddin, Muhammad Rusli. “Konsep Pecahan Dan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik.” Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran 3, no. 3 (2020): 486–92. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.3.3.2020.442.
Bujuri, Dian Andesta. “Analisis Perkembangan Kognitif Anak Usia Dasar Dan Implikasinya Dalam Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar.” LITERASI (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan) 9, no. 1 (2018): 37. https://doi.org/10.21927/literasi.2018.9(1).37-50.
Febrianto, Jefri, Petrus Fendiyanto, Suriaty, and Kukuh. “Kemampuan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Pada Materi Bilangan Bulat Dan Pecahan.” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Mulawarman 3 (2023): 204–10.
Gitnita, Sepna, Zulhendri Kamus, and Gusnedi. “Analisis Validitas, Praktikalitas, Dan Efektivitas Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Terintegrasi Konten Kecerdasan Spiritual Pada Materi Fisika Tentang Vektor Dan Gerak Lurus.” Pillar of Physics Education 11, no. 2 (2018): 153–60.
Indofah, Vitriana, Anisa, and Cahyo Hasanudin. “Anggapan Siswa Tentang Pelajaran Matematika Yang Sulit Dan Menakutkan.” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Daring, no. 2020 (2023): 1110–13.
Indriani, Ari. “Penggunaan Blok Pecahan Pada Materi Pecahan Sekolah Dasar.” JIPMat 3, no. 1 (2018): 11–16. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v3i1.2418.
Khairunnisa, Aulia, Dadang Juandi, and Sumanang Muhtar Gozali. “Systematic Literature Review: Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika.” Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 6, no. 2 (2022): 1846–56. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i2.1405.
Kurniawan, Frischa Angelline, Aan Nurfahrudianto, and Dian Devita Yohanie. “Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Ditinjau Dari Hasil Belajar Siswa.” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti 10, no. 3 (2023): 636–49. https://doi.org/10.38048/jipcb.v10i3.2077.
Linda, Zakiah, and Ika Lestari. Berpikir Kritis Dalam Konteks Pembelajaran. Erzatama Karya Abadi, 2019.
Luh Putu Ari Laksmi, Ni, and Ni Wayan Suniasih. “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran E-Comic Berbasis Problem Based Learning Materi Siklus Air Pada Muatan IPA.” Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran 5, no. 1 (2021): 56–64.
Manurung, Alberth Supriyanto, Fahrurrozi Fahrurrozi, Erry Utomo, and Gumgum Gumelar. “Implementasi Berpikir Kritis Dalam Upaya Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa.” Jurnal Papeda: Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar 5, no. 2 (2023): 120–32. https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpendidikandasar.v5i2.3965.
Mutmainna, Asfar Taufan, Asfar, Andi Nurannisa. Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Bernuansa Etnomatematika, 2016.
Putra, Dede Dwiansyah, Ardo Okilanda, Arisman Arisman, Muhsana El Cintami Lanos, Siti Ayu Risma Putri, Mutiara Fajar, Hikmah Lestari, and Sugar Wanto. “Kupas Tuntas Penelitian Pengembangan Model Borg & Gall.” Wahana Dedikasi : Jurnal PkM Ilmu Kependidikan 3, no. 1 (2020): 46. https://doi.org/10.31851/dedikasi.v3i1.5340.
Rizki Nurhana Friantini, Rahmat Winata, Pradipta Annurwanda, Siti Suprihatiningsih, Muhammad Firman Annur, Bernadeta Ritawati, and Iren. “Penguatan Konsep Matematika Dasar Pada Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Abdimas Bina Bangsa 1, no. 2 (2020): 276–85. https://doi.org/10.46306/jabb.v1i2.55.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif,Kualitatif,Dan R&D. Edited by MT Dr.Ir. Sutopo. S.pd. 2nd ed. Yogyakarta: ALFABETA, 2018.
Susilawati, Samsul. “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Digital Berbasis Website Berintegrasi Nilai-Nilai Islam” 9 (2023): 66–79.
Telaumbanua, Yamomaha. “Efektivitas Penggunan Alat Peraga Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Pada Sekolah Dasar Pokok Bahasan Pecahan.” Kaos GL Dergisi 8, no. 75 (2020): 147–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125798%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2020.02.002%0Ahttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/810049%0Ahttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/anie.197505391%0Ahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780857090409500205%0Ahttp:
Unaenah, Een, Amilanadzma Hidyah, Amiratul Muzeeb Aditya, Niken Nur Yolawati, Nurlaili Maghfiroh, Roro Rachmi Dewanti, Tiara Safitri, and Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang. “Teori Brunner Pada Konsep Bangun Datar Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial 2, no. 2 (2020): 327–49. https://ejournal.stitpn.ac.id/index.php/nusantara.
Utami, Anita Dewi, Puput Suriyah, and Novi Mayasari. Level Pemahaman Konsep Komposisi Fungsi Berdasar Taksonomi Solo, 2020.
Vakhuriroh, Wahyu. “Wawancara.” Malang, 2024.
