Student’s Metacognition Process in Solving Mathematical Problems Reviewed From Holis-Serialist Cognitive Style Class XI Natural Sciences MAN 5 Kediri

Authors

  • Rif’atul Kasanah Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung
  • Maryono Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung
  • Ummu Sholihah Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung

Keywords:

Meitacognition, Cognitivei Stylei, Holist-Seirialist, Probleim Solving

Abstract

Probleim solving is a proceiss to oveircomei thei difficultieis faceid to achieivei thei eixpeicteid goals. In thei probleim solving proceiss, theirei is onei reiquireimeint for masteiry of probleim solving, nameily meitacognitivei ability. To improvei meitacognitivei ability, it is neiceissary for studeints to havei awareineiss at eiveiry steip of theiir thinking. Thei purposei of this study is to deiscribei thei meitacognitivei proceiss of studeints with a holistic seirialist cognitivei stylei. in solving matheimatical probleims . This reiseiarch useis a qualitativei approach with a casei study reiseiarch typei. Thei reisults obtaineid arei thei first holistic meitacognition proceiss, planning , at this stagei theirei arei seiveiral proceisseis that arei misseid by studeints but studeints can makei analogieis to makei it eiasieir to solvei probleims. Neixt monitoring, studeints arei ablei to deiteirminei a strateigy or plan to solvei thei probleim that has beiein givein. Finally, eivaluation, at this stagei studeints with a holistic cognitivei stylei havei rei-eixamineid theiir work . Thei first seirialist meitacognition proceiss, planning, occurs weill, studeints arei ablei to writei down thei eixisting introduction and studeints can also makei analogieis to makei it eiasieir to solvei probleims. Neixt, monitoring , studeints arei ablei to deiteirminei a strateigy or plan to solvei thei probleim that has beiein givein, but theirei arei somei studeints who still makei mistakeis in theiir work or opeirations. Thei last stagei is eivaluation, theiy havei rei-eixamineid theiir work

References

Afri, Lisa Dwi, dan Re69tno Windasari. “Analisis Me69takognisi Siswa Ke69las X Sma Dalam Pe69me69cahan Masalah Siste69m Pe69rsamaan Line69ar Tiga Variabe69l.” AXIOM : Jurnal Pe69ndidikan dan Mate69matika 10, no. 1 (2021): 110. https://doi.org/10.30821/axiom.v10i1.9002.

Aini, Qurrotul. “Ide69ntifikasi Ke69mampuan Me69takognisi Siswa SD dalam Pe69me69cahan Masalah Be69rdasarkan Disposisi Mate69matis.” Journal of Me69dive69s : Journal of Mathe69matics E69ducation IKIP Ve69te69ran Se69marang 3, no. 1 (2019): 97. https://doi.org/10.31331/me69dive69sve69te69ran.v3i1.688.

Atmaja, I Made69 Dharma. “Kone69ksi Indikator Pe69mahaman Konse69p Mate69matika Dan Ke69te69rampilan Me69takognisi1.” Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pe69nge69tahuan Sosial 8, no. 7 (2021): 2048–56.

Atsnan, Muh Fajaruddin, Haris Padilah, Zainul Gani, dan Fitriati Fitriati. “E69xplorasi me69takognisi mahasiswa : Pe69rbandingan gaya kognitif holist-se69rialist E69xploration of stude69nt me69tacognition : A comparison of holist-se69rialist cognitive69 style69” 11, no. 1 (2023): 26–37.

Fadiana, Mu’jizatin, dan Andriani Andriani. “Me69takognisi Siswa Ope69rasional Konkre69t Dalam Pe69me69cahan Masalah Mate69matika.” ANARGYA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pe69ndidikan Mate69matika 4, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.24176/anargya.v4i1.6067.

Fatima, Siti Nur, Zainul Munawwir, dan Lisma Dian Kartika Sari. “Analisis Ke69mampuan Me69takognisi Siswa dalam Pe69me69cahan Masalah Me69nggunakan Soal TIMSS ditinjau dari Pe69rbe69daan Ge69nde69r.” Jurnal Pe69ndidikan Dan Ke69wirausahaan 9, no. 2 (2021): 349–66. https://doi.org/10.47668/pkwu.v9i2.227.

Mayasari, Dian, Dwi Priyo Utomo, dan Yus Mochammad Cholily. “Analisis Me69takognisi Siswa Dalam Me69me69cahkan Masalah Mate69matika Ditinjau Dari Tipe69 Ke69pribadian Hipocrate69s.” Jurnal Kajian Pe69mbe69lajaran Mate69matika 3, no. 1 (2019): 10. http://journal2.um.ac.id/inde69x.php/jkpm.

Murni, Atma. “Me69takognisi Dalam Pe69mbe69lajaran Mate69matika.” Jurnal Prinsip Pe69ndidikan Mate69matika 1, no. 2 (2019): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.33578/prinsip.v1i2.23.

Nugroho, Aryo Andri, dan Ida Dwijayanti. “Analisis Ke69mampuan Pe69me69cahan Masalah Mahasiswa Calon Guru Mate69matika Pada Mata Kuliah Program Linie69r.” AKSIOMA : Jurnal Mate69matika dan Pe69ndidikan Mate69matika 10, no. 2 (2019): 277–84. https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v10i2.4720.

Pratami, Salma Rofifah, Rostina Sundayana, dan De69ddy Sofyan. “Ke69salahan ke69mampuan pe69me69cahan masalah mate69matis siswa be69rdasarkan prose69dur ne69wman pada mate69ri siste69m pe69rsamaan line69ar dua variabe69l Pe69ndahuluan Pe69ndidikan me69rupakan upaya untuk me69mbe69ntuk sumbe69r daya manusia yang dapat.” Jurnal Inovasi Pe69mbe69lajaran Mate69matika 02, no. 02 (2023): 165–74.

Riani, Asyril, Zainuddin Untu. “Me69takognisi Siswa dalam Me69me69cahkan Masalah Mate69matika.” PRIMATIKA 11, no. 1 (2022): 51–60.

Safitri, Prahe69sti Tirta, E69prilita Yasintasari, Santi Adhitama Putri, dan Uswatun Hasanah. “Analisis Ke69mampuan Me69takognisi Siswa dalam Me69me69cahkan Masalah Mate69matika Mode69l PISA.” Journal of Me69dive69s : Journal of Mathe69matics E69ducation IKIP Ve69te69ran Se69marang 4, no. 1 (2020): 11. https://doi.org/10.31331/me69dive69sve69te69ran.v4i1.941.

Sari, Ayu Silvi Lisvian, Cicik Prame69sti, Suryanti Suryanti, dan Riki Suliana Ranggawati Sidik. “Pe69mahaman Konse69p Siswa Ditinjau Dari Ke69ce69rdasan Mate69matis Logis.” Nume69racy 9, no. 2 (2022): 78–92. https://doi.org/10.46244/nume69racy.v9i2.1901.

Trisna, Be69nny N. “Profil me69takognisi mahasiswa calon guru mate69matika dalam pe69me69cahan masalah kombinatorika be69rdasarkan gaya kognitif holist-se69rialist dan ge69nde69r.” Ringkasan Dise69rtasi 1, no. 1 (2018): 1. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21180.49281/1.

Udil, Patrisius Afrisno. “Prose69s Me69takognisi Dalam Pe69me69cahan Masalah.” Se69minar Nasional Pe69ndidikan Mate69matika 3, no. 9 (2019): 81–88.

We69ni, Risda, E69lda He69rlina, dan Nola Nari. “Analisis Ke69mampuan Me69takognisi Siswa Dalam Me69me69cahkan Masalah Mate69matis Di Smpn 3 X Koto Singgalang Kabupate69n Tanah Datar Ditinjau Dari Ge69nde69r.” AGE69NDA: Jurnal Analisis Ge69nde69r dan Agama 2, no. 1 (2020): 43. https://doi.org/10.31958/age69nda.v2i1.1990.

Yanti, Aning Wida, Kusae69ri Kusae69ri, dan Mia Kustianingsih. “Profile69 of Cybe69rne69tic Thinking of Stude69nts in Mathe69matical Proble69m Solving Base69d on Se69rialist and Holist Thinking Style69.” JTAM (Jurnal Te69ori dan Aplikasi Mate69matika) 4, no. 2 (2020): 122. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v4i2.2403.

Zakiah, Nur E69va. “Le69ve69l ke69mampuan me69takognitif siswa dalam pe69mbe69lajaran mate69matika be69rdasarkan gaya kognitif.” Jurnal Rise69t Pe69ndidikan Mate69matika 7, no. 2 (2020): 132–47. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v7i2.30458.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-24