POLYGAMY IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF FAMILY LAW IN TUNISIA AND TURKEY

Authors

  • Shofiyah Pascasarjana UIN Salatiga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70062/incoils.v5i1.408

Keywords:

Polygamy, Tunisia, Turkey

Abstract

Polygamy remains one of the most debated topics in Islamic family law today, particularly in relation to gender equality, justice, and state involvement in religious norms. This study evaluates the regulation of polygamy in Tunisia and Turkey to examine the philosophical basis, legal approach, and concept of justice underlying family law reform in both countries. Tunisia, through its Personal Status Code enacted in 1956, prohibits polygamy based on a progressive reinterpretation of Islamic law that emphasizes maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, particularly the principles of justice and protection of women's dignity. Meanwhile, Turkey, through its Civil Code enacted in 1926, adopted a secular legal system that completely separates family law from religious influence and stipulates that monogamy is the only legally valid form of marriage. By applying a normative juridical method accompanied by a comparative legal approach and philosophical analysis, this study finds that despite their different ideological paths, both Tunisia and Turkey have similar substantive goals, namely to guarantee gender equality, legal certainty, and social justice in the context of the family. These findings indicate that the prohibition of polygamy should not be understood as a denial of Islamic values, but rather as a legal reform or ijtihād by the state aimed at realizing the fundamental goals of justice and human dignity in modern Muslim societies.

Author Biography

Shofiyah, Pascasarjana UIN Salatiga

Polygamy remains one of the most debated topics in Islamic family law today, particularly in relation to gender equality, justice, and state involvement in religious norms. This study evaluates the regulation of polygamy in Tunisia and Turkey to examine the philosophical basis, legal approach, and concept of justice underlying family law reform in both countries. Tunisia, through its Personal Status Code enacted in 1956, prohibits polygamy based on a progressive reinterpretation of Islamic law that emphasizes maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, particularly the principles of justice and protection of women's dignity. Meanwhile, Turkey, through its Civil Code enacted in 1926, adopted a secular legal system that completely separates family law from religious influence and stipulates that monogamy is the only legally valid form of marriage. By applying a normative juridical method accompanied by a comparative legal approach and philosophical analysis, this study finds that despite their different ideological paths, both Tunisia and Turkey have similar substantive goals, namely to guarantee gender equality, legal certainty, and social justice in the context of the family. These findings indicate that the prohibition of polygamy should not be understood as a denial of Islamic values, but rather as a legal reform or ijtihād by the state aimed at realizing the fundamental goals of justice and human dignity in modern Muslim societies.

References

Abduh, Muhammad, Risalah al-Tauhid (Kairo: Dar al-Manar, 1897).

Abu Zahrah, Muhammad, Usul al-Fiqh (Kairo: Dar al-Fikr al-Arabi, 1958).

Al-Syathibi, Abu Ishaq, Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Shariah (Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2005).

Bourguiba, Habib, Discours sur la Réforme Sociale en Tunisie (Tunis: Editions Nationales, 1956).

Fahrudin, ‘Dialektika Poligami dalam Narasi Normatif dan Potret Empiris’, Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 9.2 (2021), 301–324.

Faozan, A., ‘Hukum Keluarga Islam Sebelum dan Sesudah Kemerdekaan di Tunisia’, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora, 2 (May 2025).

Fithrotul, K., ‘Poligami di Arab Saudi, Tunisia, dan Indonesia dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum’, Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora, 8.6 (2021), 1663–1675.

Hadaiyatullah, S. S., Fikri, A., Dharmayani, D., Karini, E., & Ismail, H., ‘Rekontekstualisasi Fikih Keluarga di Era Modern: Studi Perbandingan Indonesia, Tunisia, dan Turkey, Moderasi: Journal of Islamic Studies, 4.2 (2024), 140–163 (https://doi.org/10.54471/moderasi.v4i2.70).

Hakim, L., ‘Perkembangan Hukum Keluarga di Tunisia’, Jurnal PAI: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Agama Islam, 1.2 (2022), 81–94 (https://doi.org/10.33507/pai.v1i2.1014).

Ibnu Pa’qih, ‘The Prophetic Sunnah as a Legitimization of Polygamy: A Critical Review of Pengadilan Agama Decisions within the Framework of Islamic Law and Family Law’, Qanun: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 2.2 (November 2024), 182–207 (https://dx.doi.org/10.62870/qanun.v2i2.27177).

Kafutra, M., & Novel, I., ‘Konseptualisasi Pembaharuan Hukum Keluarga di Dunia Muslim (Studi Perbandingan Berbagai Negara)’, Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Islam, 10.1 (2025).

Karimullah, S. S., ‘Poligami Perspektif Fikih dan Hukum Keluarga Negara Muslim’, Maddika: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 2.1 (2021) (http://ejournal.iainpalopo.ac.id/index.php/maddika/article/view/2118).

Mahkamah Konstitusi, Kompilasi Hukum Islam (Jakarta: MK Press, n.d.).

Mamnuniyatillah, and Lilik Andaryuni, ‘Hukum Keluarga di Tunisia: Sebuah Studi Kepustakaan’, Jurnal Tana Mana, 2.1 (2022), 46–48.

Nasrulloh, Muhammad, and Doli Witro, ‘Poligami sebagai Perkawinan Abnormal: Kajian terhadap Syariat Islam’, Musãwa: Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam, 20.1 (2021), 15–28.

Quraish Shihab, M., Wawasan Al-Qur’an: Tafsir Maudhu’i atas Pelbagai Persoalan Umat (Bandung: Mizan, 1996).

Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971).

Sri Wahyuni, ‘Perbandingan Regulasi Poligami di Negara-Negara Muslim’ (2025) (https://pkbh.uinssc.ac.id/perbandingan-regulasi-poligami-di-negara-negara-muslim/).

Wulan Sari, S., & Aji Purwanto, M., ‘Perbandingan Hukum tentang Poligami di Negara Mesir dan Tunisia’, Bertuah: Journal of Shariah and Islamic Economics, 4.1 (2023), 1–13.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Shofiyah. (2026). POLYGAMY IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF FAMILY LAW IN TUNISIA AND TURKEY. Proceeding International Conference on Islam, Law, and Society (INCOILS), 5(1). https://doi.org/10.70062/incoils.v5i1.408